For James Guill
#1
[/url]who says there is no intruder evidence.

I have to ask what you have been reading and watching - - sure not the depositions or police reports, the crime scene photos or any number of GOOD sources of information.  I fear you have entered into the BORG Twilight Zone ane need to find your way back to the light and some truth.



[Image: 17553849_10211144489240127_8723842401546...e=59996F89]
James Guill No intruder evidence. Every time I ask for this alleged intruder evidence, I am given things that have been thoroughly debunked. You guys always try to twist it to fit your intruder theory. It's not there. Grand Jury indicted after looking at all of the evidence for over a year!
James Guill I've made my case repeatedly, Kathy. The basement window, shoe prints, finger/palm prints, hairs, DNA, stun gun etc.. The police report also says all doors were locked and no signs of entry at any window. If there was an intruder, he had a key. And Patsy wrote that ransom note. No doubt about it.

Starting at the beginning - - if you take one piece of evidence at a time and research it here - on webbsleuths.org - you may find you can find more intruder evidence than you can handle.

From the stun gun - the marks, the interviews with Mike Doberson - the experiments he has done - the other cases he worked on - - - to the list of "things to do" that came out of the Police meetings - - one being find out who OWNED these stun guns back then.  To the interview with the manufacturer.  That stun gun is no theory - - but as you made clear in that other discussion, you really don't care.


[Image: 17553849_10211144489240127_8723842401546...e=59996F89]
James Guill There is no proof that anyone else was in the house that night! Where's your proof?? To say that someone COULD'VE been, is not proof that there was someone!
l All that exists is a mountain of circumstantial inculpatory evidence implicating the family! No evidence of anyone else having been there! You have nothing.


[url=https://www.facebook.com/melinda.soppel?fref=ufi]Melinda Soppel then invited James Guill to read a thread on Evidence of Intruder


jameson askd - Care to guess his response?    Wait no longer.

[Image: 17553849_10211144489240127_8723842401546...e=59996F89]
James Guill No thanks.



jameson - "THIS is the BORG mentality.  Don't try to confuse their set minds with facts.  They like being BORG and, damn it, they will NOT be unassimilated!"
Reply
#2
James Guill posted that, "... we only have bits and pieces of microscopic samples that have offered only a partial DNA profile that happens to be a mixture of two or more donors. If we had a solid profile, it might work, but we just don't have much of anything to work with. I still don't think this is a DNA case at all."


Too bad he refuses to read anything but the horrid BORG pages that have little to do with the evidence and more to do with theories and myths.

James, the good DNA evidence in the Ramsey case is labeled GSLDPD99178617. It has been used for YEARS to clear people - - not just the Ramseys but also Fleet White, Chris Wolf, John Mark Karr and dozens of others.

There is new DNA testing being done as we speak at the CBI - and I am hoping Police Chief Testa will have specialized testing done at another lab. Offered to pay for it but in the spirit of secrecy, my offer was refused.

Still, with all the stories of DNA testing continuing uder the BPD - - - how can BORG still deny it exists??
Reply
#3
James Guill wrote - - Cina Wong is a board certified forensic document examiner. She first became involved with the case after she saw Patsy crying on CNN and contacted the Ramsey's offering her services as she was moved with compassion and knew she could help. Once she examined the RN however, she became 100% convinced that Patsy had in fact authored it.


My comment - LOL - They didn't hire her and she was a woman scorned. I studied her handwriting report when I was in NYC with Darnay Hoffman - - it was a joke. She looked for any possible similarity to prove Patsy did it knowing full well she didn't have the samples needed to give a professional opinion. Her work was tossed by the judge - a federal judge - - for good reason.
Reply
#4
(04-04-2017, 03:54 PM)jameson245 Wrote: [/url]who says there is no intruder evidence.

I have to ask what you have been reading and watching - - sure not the depositions or police reports, the crime scene photos or any number of GOOD sources of information.  I fear you have entered into the BORG Twilight Zone ane need to find your way back to the light and some truth.

And then if you don't accept his view, he blocks you.

[Image: 17553849_10211144489240127_8723842401546...e=59996F89]
James Guill No intruder evidence. Every time I ask for this alleged intruder evidence, I am given things that have been thoroughly debunked. You guys always try to twist it to fit your intruder theory. It's not there. Grand Jury indicted after looking at all of the evidence for over a year!
James Guill I've made my case repeatedly, Kathy. The basement window, shoe prints, finger/palm prints, hairs, DNA, stun gun etc.. The police report also says all doors were locked and no signs of entry at any window. If there was an intruder, he had a key. And Patsy wrote that ransom note. No doubt about it.

Starting at the beginning - - if you take one piece of evidence at a time and research it here - on webbsleuths.org - you may find you can find more intruder evidence than you can handle.

From the stun gun - the marks, the interviews with Mike Doberson - the experiments he has done - the other cases he worked on - - - to the list of "things to do" that came out of the Police meetings - - one being find out who OWNED these stun guns back then.  To the interview with the manufacturer.  That stun gun is no theory - - but as you made clear in that other discussion, you really don't care.


[Image: 17553849_10211144489240127_8723842401546...e=59996F89]
James Guill There is no proof that anyone else was in the house that night! Where's your proof?? To say that someone COULD'VE been, is not proof that there was someone!
l All that exists is a mountain of circumstantial inculpatory evidence implicating the family! No evidence of anyone else having been there!  You have nothing.


[url=https://www.facebook.com/melinda.soppel?fref=ufi]Melinda Soppel then invited James Guill to read a thread on Evidence of Intruder


jameson askd - Care to guess his response?    Wait no longer.

[Image: 17553849_10211144489240127_8723842401546...e=59996F89]
James Guill No thanks.



jameson - "THIS is the BORG mentality.  Don't try to confuse their set minds with facts.  They like being BORG and, damn it, they will NOT be unassimilated!"
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)